Proof of God’s Existence
Observation or Premise: Anything that was obviously made obviously had a Maker or Creator who made it.
Observation or Premise: A genome was obviously made.
Logical Conclusion: Therefore, a genome obviously has a Maker or a Creator who designed it, programmed it, engineered it, field-tested it, fine-tuned it, made it, manufactured it, and deployed it.
—
This syllogism is both a Philosophical Proof of God’s Existence and a Scientific Proof of God’s Existence. It works. It’s true. Every aspect of it is true, because both the premises and the conclusion have been experienced and observed in real life by real people. This Scientific Proof of God’s Existence is both philosophically valid and observationally sound. It, and similar ones like it, convinced me that God does indeed exist.
Variations on this syllogism were my first Scientific Proof of God’s Existence; and, I first built one based upon the non-existence of abiogenesis, or the non-existence of macro-evolution. After science itself proved to me that God must of necessity exist, then I simply KNEW that God exists, even though I still have yet to get to know God.
In 2016, when I first realized that NO type of evolution – chemical evolution, micro-evolution, macro-evolution, spontaneous generation, abiogenesis, random mutations, or natural selection – is capable of designing, creating, and implementing genomes from atoms or from scratch, I just KNEW that God exists because I KNEW why He must of necessity exist. God must exist in order to have done ALL of the science, organization, proteins, and genomes which the different types of evolution could NEVER have done.
In a very real sense, the Theory of Evolution proved to me that God exists. In other words, the inability of the different types of evolution to design, create, manufacture, and deploy proteins and the matching genes to go along with those proteins BECAME convincing scientific proof of God’s necessity, which effectively became Scientific Proof of God’s Existence.
Based upon this same exact theme, I developed many other Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence and eventually used the Scientific Method itself to falsify Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Atheism, and the Theory of Evolution.
I kept a log of my ongoing discoveries in the following books:
Summary Of: The Theory of Evolution Proves that God Exists
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01GQCWED6
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521130485
The Theory of Evolution Proved to Me that God Exists: Why I Am No Longer an Atheist and Why I No Longer Believe in the Theory of Evolution
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01HZYBZ7K
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521131228
The Scientific Method Proves That the Theory of Evolution Is False
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01IAAIRT2
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521133611
Using the Scientific Method to Eliminate the Usual Suspects and to Prove the Truth
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01J6STHP0
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1521133581
This was an era of transition for me. I used to be a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist. To develop a Scientific Proof of God’s Existence that I actually KNEW to be true, as well as using the Scientific Methods to falsify Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Atheism, and the Theory of Evolution represented a MAJOR paradigm shift in my way of thinking and doing science.
Once I finally KNEW the Truth, there was no going back to the deceptions and the lies; and, I was able to progress forward from there and make additional adjustments and improvements to my science, my worldview, and my philosophical underpinnings.
Although it is technically true – due to the affirming the consequent logic fallacy – that it’s impossible to use the Scientific Methods to prove anything true, there is a legitimate work-around that actually produces the same result. This work-around is a philosophically valid and an observationally sound way to find the truth through a process of elimination.
The way this is done in practice is that we use the Scientific Methods and negating the consequent to falsify and eliminate everything that is false such as Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, Atheism, and their derivatives so that ONLY the Truth remains.
Think about it logically.
If you successfully eliminate everything that is false – everything that has NEVER been experienced nor observed by anyone, not even God – then ONLY the Truth will remain, because ONLY the observed and the verified and the proven will remain. The Truth is whatever has been experienced, lived, and observed by Someone Psyche sometime somewhere. Science is observation, or it should be.
Sherlock Holmes taught me how this process of elimination works in principle or practice.
How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible [and the false], whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? — Sherlock Holmes.
Sherlock Holmes and the Philosophy of Science taught me how to use the Scientific Method to falsify the Theory of Evolution, Materialism, Naturalism, and Atheism; and, observations from real life people like you and me falsified Nihilism for me.
If you successfully eliminate everything that is false, then ONLY the Truth will remain; and, that’s precisely how we use the Scientific Methods to “prove” the truth, by using the Scientific Methods to eliminate everything that is false or everything that has NEVER been experienced nor observed. It works!
Mark My Words
—
Source
Science 2.0: I Upgraded My Science.